|
Introduction
Copyrights
and other intellectual property has become increasingly important to the
worldwide economy, especially for the United States which exports much more
copyright-based goods than it imports. As the worldwide economy and
international trade has grown, it has become crucial that copyrighted works be
protected on an international basis. However, protecting anything on an
international basis poses substantial problems since each country operates
independently with its own laws. There is no such thing as an international
copyright law which would provide copyright protection on a worldwide basis.
Instead, most countries have their own copyright laws which are not applicable
outside of their borders.
What is International Copyright?
Copyrights are protected on an international basis based upon a system of
treaties (agreements or contracts between two or more countries). Under these
treaties, countries agree to give protection to other countries’ copyrighted
works as long as the other countries agree to do the same. The vast majority of
the countries in the world are members of one or more copyright treaties which
collectively assure a degree of international protection for copyrighted works.
Most of the countries of the world have signed one or more treaties dealing with
copyright. In essence, the various treaties between countries are like a network
of copyright laws. The Copyright Office's
Circular 38a provides
a summary of the United States' copyright treaty relations with other countries.
Historical Note: Although the
United States is currently a staunch advocate for harmonizing copyright laws
among countries and providing for strong international copyright protection,
this hasn't always been the case. Ironically, the United States did not grant
protection to foreign works at all until 1891 and pirating of foreign
copyrighted works (primarily British) was fairly common. By the 1950s, it had
become more important that the United States insure the protection of
copyrighted works abroad. The growth in foreign markets for American goods and
the piracy of copyrighted works abroad were important reasons for doing so. It
has only been over the past several decades as the U.S. changed from an
industrial economy (manufacturing based) to an information economy that the U.S.
started being concerned with enforcing intellectual property rights
internationally. Consequently, it really isn't so surprising that many
developing countries resent U.S. efforts to pressure them into strengthening
intellectual property protection.
The Berne
Convention
The first international copyright convention was held in
Berne,
Switzerland
in 1886 and resulted in an agreement called the
Berne
Convention for the Protection of Literary & Artistic Works (commonly known as the Berne
Convention). Most of the major countries in the world are members of the Berne
Convention and it is consequently the single most important copyright treaty (a
list of all countries who are members of the Berne Convention can be downloaded
or viewed here
under "Contracting Parties").
The Berne Convention is administered by the
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), an agency of the
United Nations based in Geneva,
Switzerland.
a. The National Treatment Principle
The Berne Convention is based on what is known as the principal of
national treatment. This means each Berne member country agrees to give citizens of other
member countries at least the same degree of copyright protection that it gives
to its own citizens.
Question 10.1: If an American copyright owner sues a copyright infringer
in Japan, Japan's
copyright law copyright law will be applied to decide the
dispute and the American copyright owner will be given the same degree of
protection as Japan provides for its own citizens.
- True
- False
|
b. Minimal Protection
In addition to national treatment, the Berne Convention also imposes certain
minimum standards of protection that all member countries must guarantee. Some
of the most important of these minimum standards are:
- The duration of copyright protection must be at least for the
life of the author plus 50 years.
- Each member country must provide moral rights which can never be
transferred by an author.
- Member countries must provide in their law for rights
including reproduction, translation, adaptation
and public performance (these rights are similar, although not identical to the
right provided by
section 106 of the U.S. Copyright Act). Berne also requires the
recognition of the moral rights of attribution and integrity which the U.S.
only recognizes to a limited extent under its copyright law (i.e., certain
visual works of art).
- The law of member countries must contain some type of provision for fair quotation from copyrighted works
(such as the fair use provision in of
section 107
the U.S. Copyright Act) and allows for
exemptions for educational uses of copyrighted works.
Question 10.2:
Since the United States increased the term of copyright in 1998 to life of
the author plus 70 years, it is in violation of the Berne Convention's
requirement that the duration of copyright protection be for the author's life
plus 50 years.
- True
- False
|
c. Formalities
One very important provision of the Berne Convention says that member
countries cannot condition copyright protection on any formal requirements (formalities) such as copyright
registration and copyright notice. For a long time this was a major stumbling
block for the United States which had historically required both registration
and notice in order to own a copyright. The United States resisted joining the
Berne Convention until 1989 even though it had become the primary international
treaty dealing with copyright well before then. In order to join the Berne
Convention, the United States had to amend its copyright law in several
respects, most importantly making registration and notice optional rather than
mandatory. However, U.S. law still strongly encourages registration by providing
additional benefits to copyright owners who register within specified time
frames.
Other
Copyright Treaties
The Universal Copyright Convention
The
Universal Copyright Convention ("UCC") is another international copyright
treaty which many countries including the United States belong to. The UCC is
similar to the Berne Convention except that it allows member countries to
require some formalities as conditions to copyright protection. However, the
UCC's importance has diminished since most member countries are also members of
the Berne Convention which provides for greater protection.
The WIPO Treaties
The World Intellectual Property Organization
("WIPO") is an agency of the United Nations which works toward increasing
international legal protection for copyright and other intellectual property. In
1998, WIPO drafted two treaties designed to ensure some degree of protection to
copyrighted works in the digital environment. The United States ratified the
WIPO treaties by passing the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act in 1998 (see Unit
#11). The most important provision of the
WIPO
Copyright Treaty clarifies
that the right of reproduction applies in the digital environment by providing
that the storage of a work in a digital or electronic medium is a reproduction.
The WIPO
Performances and Phonograms Treaty provides protection for sound
recordings distributed digitally over computer networks. It requires that member
countries provide at least fifty years of protection for recordings (unlike the
United States, many foreign countries give a lesser term of copyright protection
to sound recordings than other types of works).
There are several other international treaties that also deal with
copyright law, but the main goal all of them seek to achieve is a degree of
harmony and reciprocity among member countries so that copyrights will be protecible on a worldwide basis. There are a few countries which do not have any
copyright relations with the United States and in these countries, American
copyrighted works are not given any protection. These countries include
Afghanistan, Bahrain, Bhutan, Estonia, Ethiopia, Iran, Iraq, Latvia, Mongolia,
Namibia, Nepal, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tonga, United Arab Emirates and
Yemen.
Use of Economic Pressure
to Enforce Copyright
Since industries based on copyrights such as the entertainment industry
contribute greatly to the United States' economy, the U.S. has the most to gain
from strengthened copyright laws on an international basis. The U.S. also
has the most to lose from piracy of copyrighted goods which tends to occur most
frequently in countries with weak copyright laws or weak enforcement of
copyright laws. With billions of dollars at stake, the United States sometimes
resorts to exerting economic pressure on countries that the U.S. feels to not
have adequate copyright laws in place or are not actively enforcing their laws.
The main way this is done is by threatening and in some instances imposing
trade sanctions. Specifically, the United States puts pressure on other countries to
increase intellectual property protection through the use of a
watch list
(actually two lists - a "regular" watchlist and a priority watchlist).
Each year, through what's known as the
Special 301
process, the U.S. government identifies foreign countries which it believes
lack sufficient intellectual property protection and/or enforcement. The
U.S. closely monitors countries on the watchlist and makes suggestions to
improve their laws and enforcement efforts. If countries fail to make
sufficient progress, the U.S. can impose trade sanctions.
| Example: The U.S.
Trade Representative's Special 301 Report is available
here. Although the full report is fairly long and detailed, at least
browse through the
Executive Summary which summarizes the full report. Also, take a look
at the
Priority Watch List and
Watch List to see what countries the United States feels are the worst
violators of intellectual property rights. |
Although piracy in still an enormous problem in many countries, economic
pressure by the United States has resulted in the enactment and enforcement of
intellectual property laws which are helping to at least somewhat stabilize if
not reduce piracy
levels. One thing is certain - as technology continues to make it easier
to distribute works without regard to national borders and the world becomes an
increasingly international marketplace, the protection of copyright on an
international basis will only become more important.
Optional Materials
Answers
to Questions
Answer 10.1:
True - Since both the U.S. and Japan are members of the Berne Convention,
Japan is required to give American copyright owners the same right it provides
to its own citizens.
Back to
Question
Answer 10.2: False -
The Berne Convention authorizes members to provide higher levels of protection
in their own copyright laws than the minimum levels required by Berne.
Back to Question
|